Peak Construction (London) Ltd v Savva & Anor  EWHC 1295 (Ch)
Mrs Justice Asplin, sitting in the Chancery Division, delivered judgment in the above litigation. The case concerned three interlocutory applications. Two of these applications raised difficult issues, including an application for an extension of time to file a defence where non-compliance with a freezing injunction was alleged. The application raised multiple issues concerning adjournments; extensions of time; bank statements; compliance; costs; default judgments; penal notices; time limits; and unless orders. The Court granted the Applicant an extension of time to file a defence. Arfan Khan appeared for the Applicant who was granted the extensions.
The judgement can be viewed here (at www.bailii.org/)
Arfan Khan / 16th Jun 2016
The information and any commentary on the law contained on this web site is provided free of charge for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by any member of Chambers. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a lawyer about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comments on this site. No responsibility is accepted for the content or accuracy of linked sites.
If you like what you've read but want to know more about how we can help you, simply call us:
Alternatively you can send us an email and a member of our team will contact you as soon as possible.