We use cookies to improve our site and your experience. By continuing to browse on this website you accept the use of cookies. Read more...

Grenade (UK) Ltd v Grenade Energy Ltd & Anr [2016] EWHC 877 (IPEC)

The claimant in this case brought an action for trade mark infringement of its two CTM...

...(one for the mark GRENADE and the other for a device mark that combined the word GRENADE with an image of a grenade) and a parallel action for passing off; in respect of the defendants’ use of its registered company name GRENADE ENERGY LIMITED. Both parties sold energy and sports drinks – although the defendant made no significant use of the words Grenade Energy on its products, which were mainly marketed as EPIC energy drinks. In addition to the claim against the company its sole director was also sued as a joint tortfeasor.

The defendants conceded the issue of trade mark infringement – and the court was satisfied that there was reputational damage to the claimant and that was sufficient “damage” to establish liability in passing off.

The case raises two interesting and important points. First, the defendant company was using a registered company name – but was still liable for TM infringement and passing off. It must be appreciated (and it often is not) that simply registering a company name does not give a right to use that name in the face of earlier TM rights belonging to third parties. The company registrar does not check these TM rights when agreeing to register a company name. Second, it is now becoming commonplace for the sole director of a companies to be found to be jointly liable for TM infringement and passing off: the so-called corporate veil offers no protection in such circumstances. As HHJ Hacon explained – relying on his earlier judgment in Vertical Leisure Ltd v Poleplus Ltd [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC) , where he said: “….in order to fix an alleged joint tortfeasor with liability, it must be shown both that he actively co-operated to bring about the act of the primary tortfeasor and also that he intended that his co-operation would help to bring about that act (the act found to be tortious).” It is clear from the present case that registering a company name and then allowing that name to be used in the course of trade will make the director personally liable for TM infringement and passing off – and the costs of fighting the claim.

Dr Tim Sampson / 6th May 2016


The information and any commentary on the law contained on this web site is provided free of charge for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by any member of Chambers. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a lawyer about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comments on this site. No responsibility is accepted for the content or accuracy of linked sites.

Download as PDF

Back to News