What happens when you go to Greece, get run over by an uninsured driver, lose a leg, and want to claim compensation?
Answer – for now – you claim against the Motor Insurance Bureau in the UK. “What is the measure of damages?” was the question before the Supreme Court in Moreno v MIB
 UKSC 52. Answer – whatever you would get under Greek law. Bad news for Ms Moreno, as Greek law is less generous – but better news for anyone whose relative is killed in an RTA in Italy, for instance, as Italian law apparently allows for higher fatal accident awards than English law does.
The mechanics are as follows. If someone is injured in an RTA elsewhere in the EU, EU regulations (the Sixth Directive 2009/103/EC, implemented in the UK by the Motor Vehicles (Compulsory Insurance) (Information Centre and Compensation Body) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/37), to be precise) provide a fairly simple mechanism for them to recover compensation in the UK.
Regulation 13(2)(b) provides that :
“the compensation body shall compensate the injured party in accordance with the provisions of article 1 of the second motor insurance directive as if it were the body authorised under paragraph 4 of that article and the accident had occurred in Great Britain.”
In Jacobs v MIB  EWCA Civ 1208, the Court of Appeal had held that this regulation meant that damages would be paid by the MIB as they would have been as if the accident had taken place in Great Britain.
In Moreno, the Supreme Court considered the Sixth Directive and its predecessors as creating a broad scheme which was meant to allow for injured parties to be compensated in the same way whether they were pursuing the tortfeasor directly, their insurance company, the appropriate national uninsured drivers’ guarantee fund, or the MIB here in the UK. The 2003 Regulations may have pre-dated the Sixth Directive, but they were intended to do nothing other than give effect to the relevant EU Directives in this area.
Injured people’s entitlement to compensation for accidents elsewhere in Europe therefore remains unproblematic, and the measure of damages is clear – for now. As the Court commented at , though, “with British exit from the Union, this will, no doubt, be one of the many current arrangements requiring thought”.
Ross Beaton / 31st Aug 2016
The information and any commentary on the law contained on this web site is provided free of charge for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by any member of Chambers. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a lawyer about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comments on this site. No responsibility is accepted for the content or accuracy of linked sites.
If you like what you've read but want to know more about how we can help you, simply call us:
Alternatively you can send us an email and a member of our team will contact you as soon as possible.