People

Dominic Bright

Dominic practises primarily in commercial and property law.

He appeared as sole counsel on behalf of the first appellant in a conjoined, two-day appeal before the Court of Appeal.  Dominic was seconded to the world’s largest publicly-traded property and casualty insurer.  He attended what is ‘internationally recognised as arguably the best and most intensive advocacy course in the world.’

Dominic was judicial assistant to Sir Brian Leveson (then President of the Queen’s Bench Division).

Publications

Dominic assists authors to publish academic articles and professional texts on national and international law.  He also publishes in his own right.

Books

Articles

Seminars / training

Dominic attended the 2022 Advanced International Advocacy Course at Keble College, Oxford.  He accepts invitations to present seminars / training from professional clients and attends other professional events.

Recent events

Further information

Dominic holds two postgraduate qualifications, is an active member of various domestic and international professional associations, and enjoys gardening, travelling and learning about geopolitics when time permits.

Qualifications

  • Master of Laws (LL.M) in Professional Legal Practice (incorporating the BPTC), BPP University Law School, London Holborn, awarded Distinction
  • Master of Laws (LL.M), King’s College London, School of Law, awarded Distinction
  • Law (LL.B Hons) with European Legal Studies, King’s College London, School of Law (incorporating an Erasmus exchange at Uppsala University, Sweden)

Memberships

Interests

  • Training “Merlin” the German Shepherd, playing the VAD 706 V-Drums Acoustic Design, and horse-riding
  • Conserving a Sixteenth-Century, Grade II listed property of special architectural and historic interest, as a member of The Listed Property Owners’ Club
  • National, regional and global threats, challenges and opportunities including the changing nature of geopolitics in relation to sustainable growth, prevention of conflict, and development of the rule of law

Appeals

Dominic provides advice, drafting and representation in first appeals (against the judgment of a trial judge) and second appeals (against the judgment of an appeal court).

Second

First

  • K v T – successfully made submissions, so applications to adjourn and for permission to appeal were refused, and judgment for over £32,000, over £2,000 interest, £14,000 costs and transfer to the High Court for enforcement was awarded (January 2024).
  • Conjoined appeals: B v A and G v A – successfully represented the respondents, so that, although the appeals were allowed, judgment was entered for less than £800 in the former and less than £1,300 in the latter, and, despite accepting that (different) trial counsel had led the judge into error, resisted a finding of unreasonable conduct (July 2022).
  • H v F – appellant’s notice and grounds of appeal alleging that the judge was wrong to hold that the burden of proving need to hire for social and domestic use was satisfied on the evidence of a bare assertion.  Email from professional client, dated 15 July 2022: ‘We have reviewed these documents this morning and we are very happy with them’.
  • S v G & Anor – successfully resisted an appeal (against summary judgment in respect of the first appellant, default judgment in respect of the second appellant, and judgment against both appellants for more than £105,000, about £7,000 interest, and costs of £17,000) with costs awarded on the indemnity basis (May 2021).
  • K v K – successfully applied for permission to appeal on the basis that the judge fell into error in failing to award contractual costs in a possession claim (March 2020).
  • S v A & Anor – successfully settled an appeal on the day of the appeal hearing, so that the defendants agreed to give the claimant possession forthwith (November 2019).

Testimonials

Feedback from (lay and professional) clients includes:

  • ‘Dominic is a great barrister’ (email from lay client and CEO to professional client, dated 17 November 2023).
  • ‘great result’ (email from professional client, dated 29 September 2023).
  • ‘Great result thanks Dominic!’ (Email from professional client and Partner, dated 25 July 2023).
  • ‘[The lay client] thought you were great by the way’ (email from professional client, dated 12 July 2023).
  • ‘a great outcome’ (email from professional client, dated 26 June 2023).
  • ‘Cracking result’ (email from professional client, dated 13 March 2023).
  • ‘Excellent result’ (email from professional client, dated 28 February 2023).
  • ‘very successful … Dominic had fully mastered his brief and was able to argue the matter persuasively in an immaculate presentation.’ (Email from lay client to practice manager, dated 22 February 2022).
  • ‘Dominic Bright was fantastic’ (email from professional client, dated 15 December 2022).
  • ‘As ever an absolutely fantastic result on this one’ (email from professional client, dated 8 November 2022).
  • ‘Dominic Bright … was an absolute bulldog and did not let any matter go unchallenged. … his knowledge in this area of law was outstanding and his professional manner and courtesy as well as attention to details was exemplary (email from lay to professional client, dated 6 December 2022).
  • ‘Fantastic result Dominic … Brilliant!’ (Email from professional client, dated 2 September 2022).
  • ‘great result’ (email from professional client, dated 20 July 2022).
  • ‘amazing!’ (Email from professional client and Partner, dated 2 July 2022).
  • ‘extremely impressed with Dominic’s performance’ (email from professional client, dated 1 July 2022).
  • ‘Great result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 19 April 2022).
  • ‘a real asset that you should look after’ (email from lay client, dated 14 April 2022).
  • ‘I am still in shock.  I blame brilliant advocacy’ (email from professional client, dated 13 April 2022).
  • ‘excellent result yesterday’ (email from professional client, dated 29 March 2022).
  • ‘sterling work yesterday’ (email from professional client, dated 3 March 2022).
  • ‘Cracking result’ (email from professional client, dated 3 March 2022).
  • ‘Fab result’ (email from professional client, dated 2 February 2022).
  • ‘excellent result’ (email from professional client, dated 31 January 2022).
  • ‘a stellar result’ (email from professional client, dated 17 December 2021).
  • the best person to fight this case. … His questions, his manner, just everything about him was brilliant’ (email from lay client, dated 16 December 2021).
  • ‘Great result’ (email from professional client, dated 15 December 2021).
  • ‘great result’ (email from professional client, dated 15 December 2021).
  • ‘great outcome – reflected in the excellent costs order’ (email from professional client, dated 13 December 2021).
  • ‘excellent job on this, always impressed with the time and detail you put into work on cases’ (email from professional client, dated 10 December 2021).
  • ‘What a cracker of a result!!’ (Email from professional client, dated 1 December 2021).
  • ‘Great results today’ (WhatsApp from professional client, dated 4 October 2021).
  • ‘excellent’ (email from professional client, dated 1 October 2021).
  • ‘Great result!’ (email from professional client, dated 7 September 2021).
  • ‘great result!’ (email from professional client, dated 31 August 2021).
  • ‘great result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 25 August 2021).
  • ‘Amazing result, absolutely chuffed’ (email from professional client, dated 18 August 2021).
  • ‘Excellent outcome’ (email from professional client, dated 20 July 2021).
  • ‘Bril’ (email from professional client, dated 19 July 2021).
  • ‘cracking result’ (email from professional client and Partner, dated 15 July 2021).
  • ‘great result!!’ (Email from professional client, dated 13 July 2021).
  • ‘great result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 5 July 2021).
  • ‘fantastic outcome’ (email from professional client, dated 17 June 2021).
  • ‘excellent result’ (email from professional client, dated 24 May 2021).
  • ‘fantastic result as ever’ (email from professional client, dated 9 April 2021).
  • ‘as always you’ve done an amazing job’ (email from professional client, dated 26 March 2021).
  • ‘Brilliant result’ (email from professional client and Partner, dated 19 March 2021).
  • ‘Brilliant outcome’ (email from professional client, dated 17 March 2021).
  • ‘really good result’ (email from professional client, dated 16 March 2021).
  • ‘fantastic result especially on costs (email from professional client (partner), dated 8 February 2021).
  • ‘Great result as always’ (email from professional client, dated 3 February 2021).
  • ‘Cracking result!!’ (Email from professional client, dated 21 January 2021).
  • ‘smashing result!!’ (Email from professional client, dated 11 December 2020).
  • ‘Fantastic result’ (email from professional client, dated 4 December 2020).
  • ‘fantastic result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 7 October 2020).
  • ‘an excellent win’ (email from professional client, dated 21 August 2020).
  • ‘Great result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 13 July 2020).
  • ‘wow. Just wow’ (email from professional client, dated 7 July 2020).
  • ‘I am 100% fully satisfied’ (message from lay client, received by professional client, dated 11 June 2020).
  • great result as always!’ (Email from professional client, dated 29 May 2020).
  • Great results’ (email from professional client, dated 15 May 2020).
  • ‘Great result!’ (email from lay client, dated 13 February 2020).
  • Another brilliant result’ (email from professional client, dated 22 January 2020).
  • ‘I was very impressed’ (email from professional client, dated 21 December 2019).
  • fantastic result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 15 November 2019).
  • ‘a comprehensive and sterling defence’ (email from lay client, dated 18 September 2019).
  • ‘What a brilliant result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 14 August 2019).
  • ‘extremely pleased with the result’ (email from professional client, dated 18 February 2019).
  • ‘fantastic outcome’ (email from professional client, dated 5 February 2019).

Mediation

Dominic is a registered Civil and Commercial Mediator with the Civil Mediation Council, and offers online and telephone mediation services at www.ResolvedOnline.com.  He also acts as Counsel in mediations. Dominic attended the Civil Mediation Council Annual Conference 2023.

What is mediation?

Mediation is a confidential process. Participants have control. Whether or not to mediate?  The procedure of the mediation? Whether or not there is a result?  If so, what are the terms of that result?

A mediator is neutral and has no interest in the result. A result cannot be imposed by a mediator. Participants can exchange offers, confident in the knowledge that this will have no bearing on how a judge would decide the dispute, if it was later referred to court.

Participants can safely attempt to settle without compromising their positions. If the participants agree on a result, reduce it to writing and sign it, it is binding like any other contract. If court proceedings have started, the participants may invite the court to make an order by agreement that reflects the result.

For more information, see the following pages on the website of the Civil Mediation Council:

Recent instructions as Counsel

  • F & Anor v G – successfully negotiated settlement in a mediation on the day of a fast track trial, in which judgment for about £35,000, about £3,500 interest and about £15,000 costs were claimed with a counterclaim pleaded up to £25,000 (August 2023).

European Code of Conduct for Mediators

The European Code of Conduct for Mediators (“the code of conduct”) sets out a number of principles to which Dominic has voluntarily decided to commit himself, under his own responsibility.  It is applicable in all kinds of mediation in civil and commercial matters.

For the purposes of the code of conduct, mediation means any structured process, however named or referred to, whereby two or more parties to a dispute attempt by themselves, on a voluntary basis, to reach an agreement on the settlement of their dispute with the assistance of a third person – hereinafter “the mediator”.

Adherence to the code of conduct is without prejudice to national legislation, or rules regulating individual professions.

1. COMPETENCE, APPOINTMENT AND FEES OF MEDIATORS AND PROMOTION OF THEIR SERVICES

1.1. Competence

Mediators must be competent and knowledgeable in the process of mediation.  Relevant factors include proper training and continuous updating of their education and practice in mediation skills, having regard to any relevant standards or accreditation schemes.

1.2. Appointment

Mediators must confer with the parties regarding suitable dates on which the mediation may take place.  Mediators must verify that they have the appropriate background and competence to conduct mediation in a given case before accepting the appointment.  Upon request, they must disclose information concerning their background and experience to the parties.

1.3. Fees

Where not already provided, mediators must always supply the parties with complete information as to the mode of remuneration which they intend to apply.  They must not agree to act in a mediation before the principles of their remuneration have been accepted by all parties concerned.

1.4. Promotion of mediators’ services

Mediators may promote their practice provided that they do so in a professional, truthful and dignified way.

2. INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY

2.1. Independence

If there are any circumstances that may, or may be seen to, affect a mediator’s independence or give rise to a conflict of interests, the mediator must disclose those circumstances to the parties before acting or continuing to act.

Such circumstances include:

  • any personal or business relationship with one or more of the parties;
  • any financial or other interest, direct or indirect, in the outcome of the mediation;
  • the mediator, or a member of his firm, having acted in any capacity other than mediator for one or more of the parties.

In such cases the mediator may only agree to act or continue to act if he is certain of being able to carry out the mediation in full independence in order to ensure complete impartiality and the parties explicitly consent.

The duty to disclose is a continuing obligation throughout the process of mediation.

2.2. Impartiality

Mediators must at all times act, and endeavour to be seen to act, with impartiality towards the parties and be committed to serve all parties equally with respect to the process of mediation.

3. THE MEDIATION AGREEMENT, PROCESS AND SETTLEMENT

3.1. Procedure

The mediator must ensure that the parties to the mediation understand the characteristics of the mediation process and the role of the mediator and the parties in it.

The mediator must in particular ensure that prior to commencement of the mediation the parties have understood and expressly agreed the terms and conditions of the mediation agreement including any applicable provisions relating to obligations of confidentiality on the mediator and on the parties.

The mediation agreement may, upon request of the parties, be drawn up in writing.

The mediator must conduct the proceedings in an appropriate manner, taking into account the circumstances of the case, including possible imbalances of power and any wishes the parties may express, the rule of law and the need for a prompt settlement of the dispute. The parties may agree with the mediator on the manner in which the mediation is to be conducted, by reference to a set of rules or otherwise.

The mediator may hear the parties separately, if he deems it useful.

3.2. Fairness of the process

The mediator must ensure that all parties have adequate opportunities to be involved in the process.

The mediator must inform the parties, and may terminate the mediation, if:

  • a settlement is being reached that for the mediator appears unenforceable or illegal, having regard to the circumstances of the case and the competence of the mediator for making such an assessment, or
  • the mediator considers that continuing the mediation is unlikely to result in a settlement.

3.3. The end of the process

The mediator must take all appropriate measures to ensure that any agreement is reached by all parties through knowing and informed consent, and that all parties understand the terms of the agreement.

The parties may withdraw from the mediation at any time without giving any justification.

The mediator must, upon request of the parties and within the limits of his competence, inform the parties as to how they may formalise the agreement and the possibilities for making the agreement enforceable.

4. CONFIDENTIALITY

The mediator must keep confidential all information arising out of or in connection with the mediation, including the fact that the mediation is to take place or has taken place, unless compelled by law or grounds of public policy to disclose it.  Any information disclosed in confidence to mediators by one of the parties must not be disclosed to the other parties without permission, unless compelled by law.

Complaints procedure

All complaints will be acknowledged in writing within five working days of receipt.

All complaints will be investigated and responded to within 21 working days of receipt.

On occasions, further time may be required, in which case the complainant will be notified in writing.

If the response is not accepted, the complainant can appeal to the Civil Mediation Council on certain grounds.

News & Resources

*This barrister is authorised to practice in England & Wales. Click here to search on the Bar Standards Board Barristers’ Register.

Back to People

Barristers

Richard Power

Richard Power

Head of Chambers

Call: 1983

Antonio Bueno KC

Antonio Bueno KC

Call: 1964, KC 1989

Richard Clayton KC

Richard Clayton KC

Call: 1977, KC 2002

Our Expertise