Dominic Bright

Dominic has experience of issues including jurisdiction and applicable law, forum non conveniens, pleading and proving foreign law, urgent interim applications, professional negligence, directors disputes, breach of contract, and debt recovery.

Dominic has experience of costs and case management hearings, pre-trial reviews and successful trial advocacy.

In March 2025, he successfully represented a provider of equipment leasing and asset finance at trial, so that the defence was struck out, judgment was entered for over £30,000, the claimant beat its own offer to settle, and the defendant was ordered to pay the claimant’s costs of about £20,000.

In October 2024, Dominic was instructed for a pre-trial review, and subsequently advised, drafted an application, and successfully applied to strike out as an abuse of process a substantial counterclaim based on a foreign judgment, about two weeks before a two-day, multi-track trial.

In September 2024, he made submissions at a directions hearing, so that the defence and counterclaim was struck out, summary judgment was entered, and the first defendant’s solicitor was ordered to pay the claimant’s costs.

Jurisdiction & choice of law

• H v O – advised, drafted an application, and successfully applied to strike out as an abuse of process a substantial counterclaim based on a foreign judgment, about two weeks before a two-day, multi-track trial (October 2024).

Urgent interim applications

• Advised 15 taxi drivers on procedure, pleading and proving fraud, and prospects of securing interim injunctions to prevent a third party taking possession of their taxis (October 2024).

 Directors disputes

• Drafted particulars of claim for breach of personal guarantees in respect of loan agreements for about £35,000, and about £5,000 contractual interest (January 2025).
• Drafted particulars of claim for breach of an agreement for the sale of company shares, and advised on whether that agreement was sufficiently certain to be enforceable, how the terms would likely be construed, and variation of the agreement (November 2024).

Professional negligence

• B & Anor v L – drafted an urgent defence over the weekend, and an application for strike out and / or summary judgment, asserting that the claim was time-barred, and / or discloses no reasonable grounds, where the documents amounted to some 1,400 pages (January 2025).
• T v S – particulars of claim for breach of contract and / or damages for negligence including exemplary damages arising out of the service carried out by the defendant firm of solicitors in drafting and agreeing a defective commercial lease (December 2022).
• C v O & Anor – claim form and particulars of claim for breach of contract and / or damages for negligence arising out of the service carried out by the first defendant (January 2022).
• Advised landlord in conference following an agent’s alleged failure to manage a property, resulting in loss claimed of about £40,000 (October 2021).

Breach of contract

• A v B – successfully made submissions in a case management conference, so that the trial was listed for three days (January 2025).
• B v M – drafted particulars of claim for about £50,000, following a wedding that was cancelled by an event catering and management company (December 2024).
• B v W – successfully made submissions, so that permission was granted to substitute a witness about a month before the two-day, multi-track trial (December 2024).
• Advised on the merits of a claim for breach of contract and / or breach of a duty that had been assumed, after the cam belt of a commercial vehicle failed and the vehicle was written off because it was allegedly not checked in accordance with a service agreement, where the issues included limitation and exclusion clauses, and contributory negligence (November 2024).
• Drafted particulars of claim for breach of contract and misrepresentation, following humid storage conditions in a warehouse causing over £25,000 of damage to stock, loss of sales and necessitating removal of stock to another storage facility (July 2024).
• Advice on limitation, and prospects of success, following a well-known, high street bank, losing a safe deposit box with up to £150,000 of jewellery (July 2024).

Debt recovery

• M v A – successfully made submissions, so that judgment for over £21,000, about over £4,000 interest and £11,000 costs were awarded (April 2025).
• B v F – successfully made submissions, so that the defence was struck out, judgment was entered for over £30,000, the claimant beat its own offer to settle, and the defendant was ordered to pay the claimant’s costs of about £20,000 (March 2025).
• A v O – successfully made submissions, so that judgment for about £20,000 was granted, including contractual interest, and the defendant was ordered to pay the costs of about £10,000 (January 2025).
• B v W – successfully made submissions, so that although the claim was dismissed after a two-day, multi-track trial, no order was made as to costs, despite the defendant having made three relevant Calderbank offers (January 2025).
• P v F – successfully made submissions, so that summary judgment for about £20,000 including contractual interest were granted, and the defendant was ordered to pay the claimant’s contractual costs of about £10,000 (December 2024).
• Drafted particulars of claim on behalf of a restaurant design, build and fit-out company for about £40,000, interest pursuant to the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998, and contractual costs (November 2024).
• C v A – successfully made submissions, so that permission was granted to rely on an amended defence, and the claimant was ordered to pay the associated costs (November 2024).
• L & Anor v L & Anor – successfully made submissions at a directions hearing, so that the defence and counterclaim for about £40,000 was struck out, summary judgment was entered on the claim for about £15,000, and the first defendant’s solicitor was ordered to pay the claimant’s costs of about £5,000 (September 2024).
• G v S – successfully cross-examined, and made submissions, so that judgment for over £7,500 was entered, and costs of about £4,000 were awarded, following repudiatory breach of an unregulated lease agreement in respect of telecommunications equipment (September 2024).
• P v F – successfully applied for an order for sale (July 2024).
• E v P – successfully applied for an order for sale (July 2024).
• P v F – advised in conference in respect of capacity, litigation friends, the nature of understanding required to uphold a contract, and setting aside judgment following failure to attend a trial (July 2024).
• S v H – successfully applied to set aside judgment, strike out the claim, and costs to be awarded to the defendant (June 2024).
• N v W – successfully applied to set aside judgment, the claim to be dismissed, and the claimant to pay the defendant’s costs of about £4,500 (May 2024).
• C v A – successfully applied for permission to rely on a defence with a valid statement of truth, part of the claim to be struck out, an unless order in respect of the other part of the claim, and over £1,500 costs (May 2024).
• G v R – successfully cross-examined and made submissions, so that judgment for over £8,000, about £1,000 interest, contractual costs of £4,500 and permission to appeal on “the VAT point” were awarded (March 2024).
• C v B – successfully resisted the claimant’s application for reallocation to the fast track (March 2024).
• B v B – successfully resisted the claimant’s application for relief from sanctions, so that the claim remained struck out (February 2024).
• H v S – successfully resisted the claimant’s application for reallocation to the fast track (February 2024).
• G v B – successfully resisted the claimant’s application for relief from sanctions, so that the claim remained struck out, and the defendant was awarded the costs of the application as claimed (January 2024).

Dominic has experience of commercial disputes relating to construction operations and party walls.

He has advised on prospects, offers and strategy before proceedings, drafted proceedings for breach of contract and quantum meruit following substantial construction operations, and drafted proceedings to enforce an adjudication award.

Recent instructions

• T v M & Anor – drafted a reply and defence to counterclaim, including that the defence and counterclaim should be struck out and / or summary judgment entered for the claimant (February 2025).
• Advised in conference on alternative dispute resolution, the potential claim for breach of contract, potential defences to that claim, whether the contract had been terminated, quantum meruit, offers and costs, following a substantial refurbishment of two floors (November 2024).
• Drafted defence asserting that there was no reasonable grounds for bringing the claim, no cause of action was pleaded, and the claimant exchanged insufficient information before issuing the claim for the defendant to understand it (June 2024).
• Advice in conference in respect of adjournment, reallocation, what works were agreed, at what price, whether the  agreement was varied, breach, expert evidence, costs and offers, in respect of a claim where the amount in dispute was over £30,000 (June 2024).
• Advice on prospects of successfully applying for summary judgment, and compliance with the Pre-action Protocol for Construction and Engineering Disputes (May 2024).
• W & Anor v G & Anor – successfully applied for relief from sanctions in respect of late filing and service of evidence, and resisted an application to summarily dispose of the appeal under the Party Wall Act 1996 (January 2024).
• Successfully cross-examined the claimant’s witness, and made submissions, so that the claim for about £15,000 was dismissed, and the claimant was ordered to pay £4,000 towards the defendant’s costs (January 2024).
• Advice on disclosure and whether surveyors acted ultra vires and should therefore be joined as parties to an appeal under the Party Wall Act 1996 (January 2024).
• T v M & Anor – drafted particulars in a claim for breach of contract, alternatively quantum meruit, following internal and external redecoration works and installation of anti-flood devices (March 2024).
• E v B – successfully made submissions, so that the claimant company was refused relief from sanctions and therefore permission to rely on its witness statements, the claim was dismissed and the claimant was ordered to pay the defendant’s costs, despite dismissal of the counterclaim (January 2024).
• Advice in conference in respect of building works totalling about £70,000 (December 2023).
• A v H – drafted pleadings to enforce an adjudication award in favour of a home buyer against a home builder for about £26,500 and over £1,000 interest (August 2023).
• Drafted Tomlin order on behalf of a property developer, who sold a property well in excess of £1 million, before the purchaser issued a claim for breach of contract, including allegations that construction work caused the death of 12 beech and sycamore trees (August 2021).

Dominic has experience of advising, drafting and representation in commercial property disputes, including those involving interim rent, forfeiture following breach of the lease, dilapidations, assignment, subletting, parting with possession, repairs, applications for new tenancies, and relief from forfeiture.

He also has experience of real property disputes, including water easements, rights of way, amending the Land Register, interim and final possession orders against “persons unknown”, trespass, nuisance, leasehold disputes, boundary disputes, mortgage disputes, derogation from grant, constructive and resulting trusts, guarantees, acquisition orders, warrants of restitution, and enfranchisement.

Dominic is an Associate Member of the Property Bar Association.

 Commercial

• H v B – drafted a claim and supporting evidence in a claim for interim rent in the sum of about £200,000 (November 2024).
• M v W – advice on terms of settlement following forfeiture for non-payment of rent (September 2024).
• H & Anor v N – successfully applied for possession of a company let following a notice to quit (August 2024).
• M v W – particulars of claim for possession following forfeiture for non-payment of rent, judgment for about £55,000, mesne profits, contractual interest, and contractual costs (July 2024).
• M v W – advice on what steps can be taken to forfeit a commercial lease (July 2024).
• V v C – successfully applied for possession following forfeiture for non-payment of rent, judgment for over £45,000, daily loss of use and occupation charges, contractual costs as claimed of over £1,500, about £2,500 interest, release of the deposit, and transfer to the King’s Bench Division of the High Court for enforcement (July 2024).
• Advice on whether the landlord had waived the right to forfeit in respect of non-payment of rent, whether returning the rent revives the right to forfeit, and whether the right to forfeit can be exercised in the future (June 2024).
• Advice on a deed of variation, which was alleged to relinquish the tenant from its obligations under the lease, and delay in respect of service of a schedule of dilapidations (May 2024).
• P v S – successfully applied for possession following forfeiture in respect of insurance, reserve fund, service and administration charges, and costs, over £3,500 interest, and contractual costs (March 2024).
• K v S – particulars of claim for possession following forfeiture on the basis of non-payment of rent, judgment for over £100,000, mesne profits, over £6,000 interest, and contractual costs (January 2024).

Water easements

• Advice on liability to carry out works to a water pipe on the servient tenement in respect of a water easement, whether it was necessary to enter into a new deed following the water supply being re-routed, and liability to pay the costs thereof (October 2024).
• Advice in respect of a borehole, private water supply and water easements to three dominant tenements, including water charges, maintenance charges of the pump and other equipment, abstraction licenses, notices where private water supplies are a potential danger to human health, unwholesome or insufficient, negligence, and liability under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 for damage caused by defective water (October 2024).

Rights of way

• Advice on settlement and prospects of successfully objecting to an application to amend the Land Register, so as to properly protect a right of way, when a new house had since been built on the servient tenement, so that the right of way could no longer be exercised (June 2024).
• Advice in relation to whether new rights of way by express grant were needed in relation to two pieces of land for which planning permission was granted utilising new entry and egress points (May 2023).

“Persons unknown”

• B & Two Ors v Persons Unknown – successfully applied for an interim possession order, and subsequently a final possession order forthwith (January 2025).
• M v Persons Unknown – successfully applied for an interim possession order (August 2024).
• V v Persons Unknown – successfully applied for a final order for possession, and permission to dispense with service (January 2024).
• I v Persons Unknown – successfully applied for outright possession forthwith (November 2023).
• O v G & Persons Unknown – successfully applied for possession, the first defendant (who was a named party) to pay for costs as claimed of over £4,000 (January 2023).
• S v Persons Unknown re C Road – successfully applied for possession (February 2022).
• S v Persons Unknown re P Road – successfully applied for an interim possession order (October 2021).
• S v Persons Unknown re Q Road – successfully applied for an interim possession order (October 2021).

Trespass & nuisance

• M v C – particulars of claim for nuisance, negligence and an injunction, following water ingress (October 2024).
• W v J & Anor – particulars of claim for an injunction and damages for obstruction of a right of way, and an injunction and damages for trespass and / or nuisance (November 2023).
• B & Two Ors v G & Anor – successfully cross-examined and made submissions, so that damages were awarded following loss and damage caused by a cistern that froze, cracked and caused water to pour into a flat on a floor below, due to the defendants’ negligence in failing to turn off the water and / or heat an unoccupied property in winter (March 2023).
• C v M – advised on prospects of a claim for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment and / or derogation from grant and likely cost of arbitration under an arbitration clause, when an adjacent hotel was using a forecourt as a beer garden, causing a nuisance and interfering with the use of the property (February 2023).

Leasehold disputes

• M v M – successfully applied for possession following forfeiture of a lease, on the basis of arrears of service charges, contractual interest, and contractual costs on the indemnity basis (August 2024).
• C v B – successfully made submissions, so that permission was given to file and serve amended particulars of claim for service charges, and a defence to the counterclaim (July 2024).
• Advice on particulars of claim for service charges that were at risk of being struck out, and failure to file a defence to the counterclaim (July 2024).
• Particulars of claim for possession in respect of a property let on a long lease, mesne profits and contractual costs (September 2023).
• Advised leaseholders renting out a property to tenants on: prospects of successfully defending a claim for service charges, internal and external building costs; whether the incoming leaseholder is responsible for the unrecovered service charge of the outgoing leaseholder; how to challenge the service charge on the basis of reasonableness; and whether the landlord has a contractual right to costs on the indemnity basis (September 2020).

Boundary disputes

• H & Anor v P & Anor – successfully made submissions during a pre-trial review, so that a site visit was not incorporated into the timetable for trial of a boundary dispute, so that the court would decide on the basis of the expert evidence appearing to favour the claimant (October 2024).

Mortgage disputes

• M v G & Two Ors – successfully applied for possession and judgment of over £310,000 against the first and second defendants following mortgage arrears (December 2023).
• Reply and defence to counterclaim in respect of a mortgage possession claim, where the issues included non est factum, misrepresentation, an overriding interest, priority of interests and subrogation (November 2023).
• Pleadings claiming forfeiture of a long lease following judgment that service charges were owed and service of a section 146 notice (August 2023).
• M v S – successfully applied for an outright possession order within six weeks in a mortgage possession claim (August 2023).

Derogation from grant

• Advice on prospects of injunctive relief, derogation from grant and the value of a potential claim in respect of a forecourt that was being used by a nearby hotel as a beer garden (August 2023).
• C v M – advised on prospects of a claim for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment and / or derogation from grant and likely cost of arbitration under an arbitration clause, when an adjacent hotel was using a forecourt as a beer garden, causing a nuisance and interfering with the use of the property (February 2023).

Constructive & resulting trusts

• Advice on the merits of bringing a claim for £75,000 in respect of the balance owed, an oral agreement between cohabitees and thereby change in the common intention to hold a property in equal shares following purchase in joint names (December 2022).

Guarantees

• Advice on prospects of recovering rent arrears, costs and damages, from a guarantor under a guarantee agreement (May 2024).

Acquisition orders

• M & Anor v L – successfully applied for an acquisition order, enabling the claimant leaseholders to acquire the freehold title, on grounds including that their landlord could not be found, plus full costs of about £6,000 (following a successful application for relief from sanctions after the claim was struck out) (July 2020).

Warrants of restitution

• P v H – successfully applied for a warrant of restitution (in aid of a warrant of possession) and costs of the application (February 2022).

Enfranchisement

• S v S – successfully represented the freehold owner of 24 flats in an application for determination of the terms of acquisition remaining in dispute, namely: the combined freehold vacant possession value of all flats; the ground rent capitalisation rate; whether seven parking spaces were appurtenant property; the value of the appurtenant property; and the total sum payable for the freehold interest (November 2022).

Feedback from (lay and professional) clients includes:

• ‘Dominic was absolutely fantastic throughout this trial from receipt of instruction through to the hearing.  He was extremely thorough on all aspects of the case, rules and law ensuring we would not be blindsided at trial, and was happy to discuss any queries and offer suggestions where needed.  Overall a fantastic result for the Client and an absolute pleasure to deal with, will not hesitate in ensuring Dominic is my first port of call on upcoming trials.’ (Email from Tom Bending at J E Baring & Co Solicitors and professional client, dated 7 April 2025).
• ‘I have instructed Dominic on a number of occasions and he never fails to impress with his eye for detail and ability to get to grips with a case, even on occasions when he has relatively little time to prepare.  He is always easy to communicate with and I am happy to recommend him to clients and colleagues.’  (Email from Chris Hall, Associate Solicitor at Dutton Gregory and professional client, dated 31 March 2025).
• ‘Dominic did a sterling job for us on Friday.  I was very appreciative and grateful.’  (Email from professional client to practice manager, dated 31 March 2025).
• ‘I have had the privilege of working with Dominic on several cases and I cannot praise his expertise highly enough.  He has exceptional attention to detail and outstanding advocacy skills.  Dominic has always delivered with his meticulous and strategic approach.’  (Email from Ahmet Ozcan, Partner at London Solicitors and professional client, dated 12 March 2025).
• ‘Having instructed Dominic on a number of challenging cases, I have found him to be meticulous and diligent in his preparation which has led to success on each occasion.’  (Email from David Croot, Director of DCB Legal and professional client, dated 12 February 2025).
• ‘Thank you for the excellent result last week’ (text message from professional client, dated 1 February 2025).
• ‘On a recent urgent instruction Dominic quickly digested the considerable number of papers, rapidly distilled the issues and drafted accordingly with laser like focus whilst in the midst of preparing for a trial on another matter. We would have no hesitation in instructing him again.’  (Email from Serhat Sik, Senior Solicitor at Lewis Nedas Law and professional client, dated 23 January 2025).
• ‘thank you for your hard work and assistance over the past year’ (email from professional client, dated 20 December 2024).
• ‘Thanks again for all the hard work Dominic’ (email from professional client and Partner, dated 23 October 2024).
• ‘Thanks for all the hard work so far and excellent result!!’ (email from professional client and Partner, dated 21 October 2024).
• ‘Thank you for … your hard work yesterday, much appreciated’ (email from professional client, dated 4 October 2024).
• ‘thank you for your efforts today.  Both myself and [T] are absolutely stoked with the outcome!’ (email from professional client, dated 17 September 2024).
• ‘great result!’ (email from professional client, dated 15 August 2024).
• ‘Thank you for your email below and result at trial’ (email from professional client, dated 7 August 2024).
• ‘Thank you very much for your assistance in this result and the excellent outcome.  Look forward to working together again in the future’ (email from professional client, dated 30 July 2024).
• ‘great result and very comprehensive attendance note!’ (email from professional client, dated 1 July 2024).
• ‘The client was adamant when I spoke to her yesterday on how grateful she was that you were there representing her’ (email from professional client, dated 27 June 2024).
• ‘Gents, I just wanted to put in writing my thanks (and praise) to Dominic. … he has gone well beyond what I would have expected and his thoroughness and ability to simplify matters has really been first class.  I don’t often praise counsel in writing (even when they have done a good job) but [I] thought it was right on this occasion’ (email from professional client to practice managers, dated 6 June 2024).
• ‘thank you very much for your diligent work on this case’ (email from professional client, dated 22 May 2024).
• ‘we have vacant possession of this property and the landlord asked me to pass on his thanks’ (email from professional client, dated 12 April 2024).
• ‘Dominic is a great barrister’ (email from lay client and CEO to professional client, dated 17 November 2023).
• ‘great result’ (email from professional client, dated 29 September 2023).
• ‘Great result thanks Dominic!’ (Email from professional client and Partner, dated 25 July 2023).
• ‘[The lay client] thought you were great by the way’ (email from professional client, dated 12 July 2023).
• ‘a great outcome’ (email from professional client, dated 26 June 2023).
• ‘Cracking result’ (email from professional client, dated 13 March 2023).
• ‘Excellent result’ (email from professional client, dated 28 February 2023).
• ‘very successful … Dominic had fully mastered his brief and was able to argue the matter persuasively in an immaculate presentation.’ (Email from lay client to practice manager, dated 22 February 2022).
• ‘Dominic Bright was fantastic’ (email from professional client, dated 15 December 2022).
• ‘As ever an absolutely fantastic result on this one’ (email from professional client, dated 8 November 2022).
• ‘Dominic Bright … was an absolute bulldog and did not let any matter go unchallenged. … his knowledge in this area of law was outstanding and his professional manner and courtesy as well as attention to details was exemplary (email from lay to professional client, dated 6 December 2022).
• ‘Fantastic result Dominic … Brilliant!’ (Email from professional client, dated 2 September 2022).
• ‘great result’ (email from professional client, dated 20 July 2022).
• ‘amazing!’ (Email from professional client and Partner, dated 2 July 2022).
• ‘extremely impressed with Dominic’s performance’ (email from professional client, dated 1 July 2022).
• ‘Great result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 19 April 2022).
• ‘a real asset that you should look after’ (email from lay client, dated 14 April 2022).
• ‘I am still in shock.  I blame brilliant advocacy’ (email from professional client, dated 13 April 2022).
• ‘excellent result yesterday’ (email from professional client, dated 29 March 2022).
• ‘sterling work yesterday’ (email from professional client, dated 3 March 2022).
• ‘Cracking result’ (email from professional client, dated 3 March 2022).
• ‘Fab result’ (email from professional client, dated 2 February 2022).
• ‘excellent result’ (email from professional client, dated 31 January 2022).
• ‘a stellar result’ (email from professional client, dated 17 December 2021).
• ‘the best person to fight this case. … His questions, his manner, just everything about him was brilliant’ (email from lay client, dated 16 December 2021).
• ‘Great result’ (email from professional client, dated 15 December 2021).
• ‘great result’ (email from professional client, dated 15 December 2021).
• ‘great outcome – reflected in the excellent costs order’ (email from professional client, dated 13 December 2021).
• ‘excellent job on this, always impressed with the time and detail you put into work on cases’ (email from professional client, dated 10 December 2021).
• ‘What a cracker of a result!!’ (Email from professional client, dated 1 December 2021).
• ‘Great results today’ (WhatsApp from professional client, dated 4 October 2021).
• ‘excellent’ (email from professional client, dated 1 October 2021).
• ‘Great result!’ (email from professional client, dated 7 September 2021).
• ‘great result!’ (email from professional client, dated 31 August 2021).
• ‘great result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 25 August 2021).
• ‘Amazing result, absolutely chuffed’ (email from professional client, dated 18 August 2021).
• ‘Excellent outcome’ (email from professional client, dated 20 July 2021).
• ‘Bril’ (email from professional client, dated 19 July 2021).
• ‘cracking result’ (email from professional client and Partner, dated 15 July 2021).
• ‘great result!!’ (Email from professional client, dated 13 July 2021).
• ‘great result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 5 July 2021).
• ‘fantastic outcome’ (email from professional client, dated 17 June 2021).
• ‘excellent result’ (email from professional client, dated 24 May 2021).
• ‘fantastic result as ever’ (email from professional client, dated 9 April 2021).
• ‘as always you’ve done an amazing job’ (email from professional client, dated 26 March 2021).
• ‘Brilliant result’ (email from professional client and Partner, dated 19 March 2021).
• ‘Brilliant outcome’ (email from professional client, dated 17 March 2021).
• ‘really good result’ (email from professional client, dated 16 March 2021).
• ‘fantastic result especially on costs (email from professional client (partner), dated 8 February 2021).
• ‘Great result as always’ (email from professional client, dated 3 February 2021).
• ‘Cracking result!!’ (Email from professional client, dated 21 January 2021).
• ‘smashing result!!’ (Email from professional client, dated 11 December 2020).
• ‘Fantastic result’ (email from professional client, dated 4 December 2020).
• ‘fantastic result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 7 October 2020).
• ‘an excellent win’ (email from professional client, dated 21 August 2020).
• ‘Great result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 13 July 2020).
• ‘wow.  Just wow’ (email from professional client, dated 7 July 2020).
• ‘I am 100% fully satisfied’ (message from lay client, received by professional client, dated 11 June 2020).
• ‘great result as always!’ (Email from professional client, dated 29 May 2020).
• ‘Great results’ (email from professional client, dated 15 May 2020).
• ‘Great result!’ (email from lay client, dated 13 February 2020).
• ‘Another brilliant result’ (email from professional client, dated 22 January 2020).
• ‘I was very impressed’ (email from professional client, dated 21 December 2019).
• ‘fantastic result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 15 November 2019).
• ‘a comprehensive and sterling defence’ (email from lay client, dated 18 September 2019).
• ‘What a brilliant result!’ (Email from professional client, dated 14 August 2019).
• ‘extremely pleased with the result’ (email from professional client, dated 18 February 2019).
• ‘fantastic outcome’ (email from professional client, dated 5 February 2019).