Extended Civil Restraint Orders

Sartipy (aka Hamila Sartipy) v Tigris Industries Inc [2019] EWCA Civ 225

This is a leading authority on the requirements for an extended civil restraint order.


CPR 3.11 provides that a practice direction may set out the: 1) circumstances in which a court may make a civil restraint order; 2) procedure where a party applies for a civil restraint order; and 3) consequences of a civil restraint order.

Three kinds

Practice Direction 3C provides for three kinds of civil restraint order: 1) limited; 2) extended; and 3) general.

A limited order may be made ‘where a party has made 2 or more applications which are totally without merit’. An extended order may be made ‘where a party has persistently issued claims or made applications which are totally without merit’.

A general order may be made ‘where the party against whom the order is made persists in issuing claims or making applications which are totally without merit, in circumstances where an extended civil restraint order would not be sufficient or appropriate’.

“Totally without merit”

A claim or application is totally without merit if it is bound to fail. That is, there is no rational basis on which it could succeed. It need not be abusive, made in bad faith, or supported by false documents.


Persistence in this context requires at least three such claims, or applications. The Court of Appeal added seven further clarifications. The third and seventh are particularly important.

Only claims or applications where the party in question is the claimant, counterclaimant, or applicant can be counted. A defendant or respondent may behave badly, for example, by telling lies in evidence, producing fraudulent documents, or putting forward defences in bad faith, however, that does not constitute issuing claims, or making applications.

When considering whether to make a restraint order, the court is entitled to take into account any previous claims, or applications, which the court concludes were totally without merit. The court is not limited to claims or applications so certified at the time. In such cases, however, the court will need to ensure that there is sufficient information about the previous claim, or application in question.


The information and any commentary on the law contained on this web site is provided free of charge for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by any member of Chambers. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. You are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a lawyer about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comments on this site. No responsibility is accepted for the content or accuracy of linked sites.

Our Expertise