“There is nothing wrong with a shortcut, provided you don’t get lost.” Unfortunately, in this instance, the first instance judge erred in taking too many.
How much of the written material placed before the court in a civil action should be accessible to people who are not parties to the proceedings?
When part of a post-employment covenant is in unreasonable restraint of trade, in what circumstances should the court sever, and remove it, so as to leave the employee bound by the remainder of it?
In May 2019 the Privy Council delivered its Judgment in UBS AG New York v Fairfield Sentry Ltd (In Liquidation) (British Virgin Islands).